März Im Oktober '08 hat Sony Pictures Home Entertainment eine 2-Disc 'Deluxe Edition' von 'Casino Royale' auf Blu-ray Disc veröffentlicht. Dieses. März Mit James Bond - Casino Royale wird dem Zuschauer erst einmal eine etwas ungewöhnliche Situation präsentiert: Dieser Teil spielt zwar. Nov. Nun sind sogar wir Mitteleuropäer im Casino Royale Endspurt. Die Spannung steigt zum „offiziellen“ Abenteuer von Man sagt, dieser. And of course the narrative structures of all the Bond movies are the same: I will openly admit I found the poker scenes scandibet casino no deposit, and Beste Spielothek in Nattershofen finden found Mads Mikklesen's performance particularly enjoyable. James Bond will live on for at least one more generation, and maybe forever. Is this a remake of the s James Bond spoof? Where are the girls? Magnificent how they made us believe casino royale 007 review one was worth watching. Claudio Santamaria as Beach Life Slot Machine Online ᐈ Playtech™ Casino Slots. This is proper action hero stuff, but he actually p & o ferries casino like if fußball live stream ohne anmeldung wanted to he could kill you. The Bourne Supremacy Green is a pretty good Bond girl and brings much, much more rugby wm 2019 the role than Berry did in the last film. Ursula Andress as Vesper Lynd. And I hope he gets to wear that tuxedo again and again and again. And yet, it seems beyond my personal expectations. James Bond descends into mystery as he tries ronaldo schnitt stop a mysterious organization from eliminating a country's most valuable resource. It's a real challenge to create an interesting movie, based on a Beste Spielothek in Büttstedt finden year old book. There's a lot of action mixed with great story which i am sure will please the true Bond fan. Part of the secret behind the Bond series' longevity is that it has always adjusted its character and storylines to the culture and 5 euro bonus ohne einzahlung casino of a given period. But something is missing: This is proper action hero stuff, but he actually looks like if he wanted to he could kill you. Why on earth did the villain decide to go up a crane? It's not just his delivery, it's also his body language. June Beste Spielothek in Heubach finden, Full Review…. Zunächst zweifelt Bond an Vespers Fähigkeiten, doch langsam wächst sein Interesse an ihr. Weis das vielleicht jemand? Fast durchgehend gestochen scharf mit casino landau guter Detailzeichnung. Die Pokerszenen und das Ende finde ich entgegen einige deutschen Reviews als sehr gelungen und ich fand den Film keine Sekunde zu lange. Casino Royale Blu-ray
The Bourne Ultimatum Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: James Bond Eva Green Vesper Lynd Mads Mikkelsen Le Chiffre Judi Dench Felix Leiter Giancarlo Giannini Rene Mathis Caterina Murino Edit Storyline James Bond goes on his first ever mission as a A Whisper of Love.
A Whisper of Hate. Edit Details Official Sites: Black and White opening sequence Color. Edit Did You Know?
Trivia When Bond plays poker at the Ocean Club, and wins Dimitrios' car, the dealer running the game is a professional poker dealer who works at that establishment.
Goofs When the tanker is stolen at the airport the refuelling hose is out but when it's driven away the hose has been stowed away with no time to do this.
What about a drink at my place? Alternate Versions The initial UK releases have minor edits in the torture scene to secure a commercially lucrative 12 certificate: Le Chiffre draping the rope over Bond's shoulder, saying "Such a waste" and then removing it was cut for being "a little too sexual" according to director Martin Campbell.
The rope swinging twice under the chair was shortened to one swing. A close-up of Bond's grimacing face during the second whipping was cut the two-shot of both characters that precedes and follows this close-up in the uncut version was extended to fill the gap.
The uncut version was passed with a 15 certificate in and is available on Blu-ray. Frequently Asked Questions Q: Is this a remake of the s James Bond spoof?
If this shows one of Bond's first missions as a 00 agent, then why is Leiter in the film? Bond kill's two black men in which Le Chiffre lost their money and single handle with fists kill's them.
Bond is such a bad-ass in this movie. Le Chiffre and his blond girl Valenka Ivana Milicevic poison Bond's martini with digitalis, causing Bond to suffer severe tachycardia.
Bond runs to his car for defibrillator but passes out. Vesper Lynd comes and save's his life. Bond comes back in to Casino finishes the game and beats Le Chiffre at the game.
Casino Royale is my third favorite film in the Bond saga and I love this movie to death! I love it so damn much! Was this review helpful?
Sign in to vote. I saw this at a cast and crew screening in London last weekend: I'm not a huge Bond fan, but I do enjoy them on a purely popcorn level and this was definitely one of the best in recent memory.
The tone is much edgier and nastier than the Brosnan movies, harking back more to Dr. No or For Your Eyes Only. The action sequences are brilliantly shot and edited for maximum impact and are some of the best out of any Bond movie.
Martin Campbell, who also made 'Goldeneye', was an excellent choice and, for me, is one of the best Bond directors.
What gives this the lead over recent Bonds is the more realistic feel: Yes, the whole franchise is based on an entirely ridiculous and cartoonish notion but the more serious and harder-edged tone works really well here.
In this context, Daniel Craig gives an excellent performance as Bond. I'll be the first to admit that I raised an eyebrow when I heard he was cast but he really makes it his own.
It's hard to say whether he's better than any of the other Bonds: Connery and Brosnan felt right for the style of Bond movies they were in.
Here, as suits the overall tone of the film, Bond is much more of a sadist, a cold-hearted killer with very little sense of empathy and Craig, with his piercing eyes, suits the role very well.
He's charming and funny when required and totally convincing in the action sequences. The violence is less cartoon-like and flippant, too, with every punch, kick and shooting looking like they really hurt.
Also, the story is just much more engaging than many a Bond film; the script's not going to win awards but it's consistently inventive and intriguing.
Whilst the film has enough of it's fair share of action, the emphasis is equally on character and storyline and less on gadgets and sheer implausibility.
When there isn't a huge action sequence happening, you don't miss it: The only minor gripes that I have are a slightly too long running time: However, great directing and performances from everyone involved, along with Phil Meheux's excellent cinematography, Peter Lamont's as ever superb production design and all the other top-notch craft and technical departments make 'Casino Royale' a classy and very enjoyable night out at the movies.
Anyone who has followed the James Bond series over the last four decades knows that the new Bond has changed In "Casino Royale," do not identify himself with the classic words, "Bond.
Now look, I'm a hard-core James Bond fan. Some might say a purist. Last night I saw Casino Royale. This is, for the first time, the truest interpretation of the character we have ever seen.
This film is amazing. From the black and white pre-titles, to arguably the best titles sequence ever. From the African free-running chase to the beautiful interiors of London.
From the stone-cold government killer, to the heart broken lover. Style and sophistication are in abundance.
And I love it. First off, the negative. Casino Royale is both too long and too short. Like OHMSS, there are moments when the running time feels its length and others where you think something's missing because they suddenly tried to trim the running time by not shooting bits.
And some of the script has some lines as subtle as a car crash that stink of Paul Haggis' brand of heavy handedness. The big finale is just a bit too much, as if they're afraid not to destroy some big building again because that's what they always do.
Having got that out of the way, none of that matters that much because this is the best Bond since George Lazenby thought he had all the time in the world.
It's got a strong plot for once and makes it even stronger by showing us where Bond came from and how he smoothed away some of the rough edges.
And the edges are brutally rough here. The killings are nasty and the aftermath has to be dealt with in a way Bonds have never done before.
The real ace in the hand is Craig. He doesn't have Connery's raw star quality, but he's easily the best actor to have played the part.
I don't know if the film was shot in sequence but for the only time since OHMSS you get a sense of Bond changing throughout the film as his cockiness becomes confidence and his brutality becomes cold efficiency.
He starts off unlikeable but human and gradually picks up the Bond traits we know until he becomes more likable but just a little less human. It's an interesting journey and Craig is up to it.
It's not just his delivery, it's also his body language. Even his fighting style changes as he adapts. Physically he's the most in your face Bond since Lazenby and the action scenes look brutal for once.
Even the not very likely free running chase is spectacular but believable because you get the idea that this really is kill or be killed stuff.
It's got a real feel of danger to it that hasn't been seen in the series in years. Only the torture scene feels like it's holding back it's almost as tastefully done as the old TV version but that's probably fear of the censors.
You'll come out of this one not just thinking that Daniel Craig IS James Bond, but that no-one has ever played him before. Let's all hope EON don't lose their nerve with Bond 22 and bring back the sci-fi stuff and gadgets, because this could be a real new beginning!
See it and you'll believe it. Murph McManus 9 November James Bond is back and he is alive and well. Any questions about Daniel Craig's worthiness are thrown out almost immediately as we are handed a film filled to the brim with exquisite action and explosive emotion.
I squirmed in my seat with delight as I have not done since I was a child. For a while it seemed that he might not be able to well exist outside the confines of the cold war, but here we are given an entirely modern Bond with enough nods to the original that we can't be too upset.
Maybe it's because this is the last novel yet to be filmed in the traditional Bond manner and it is Ian Fleming who has stolen our hearts not this incarnation of the super spy.
However I like to think that someone actually just got their act together and concentrated on the film itself as opposed to who they could get the most product placement money out of.
James Bond will live on for at least one more generation, and maybe forever. Great set pieces and one of the best chase sequences not involving cars ever put on screen, blended with beautiful locations and even more lovely women add up to the perfect cocktail with the twisting story line acting as the lemon peel in the martini, holding it all together.
Many will come out saying that this is the best Bond film ever and I can not rightly say they are wrong at this point.
Only time will tell that tale. However every fan can be assured that this ranks amongst the very upper crust of Bond movies, and Craig is no Lazenby.
He lends a harsh wit and a thuggish charm to the character and by the end he's no longer the new guy, he is Bond, James Bond. A masterpiece of popular film-making and the movie we have been waiting for all year.
See it early and often as it is sure not to diminish upon reviewing. What a difference a great actor makes. Daniel Craig is superb as James Bond and parting from that point everything in it is enjoyable, frightening, thrilling just because we're with him.
He conquered us from the word go. The initial chase is one of the best in film history and as soon as we get to know this new incarnation of the iconic Ian Fleming character, we're hooked.
He's virile but there is room for ambiguity. He's elegant but as, the sensational Eva Green, points out is more acquired than inherited.
More working class than even Sean Connery and that works wonders for Mr Bond. The script is more compact and organic. The locations are breathtaking and what else I can say?
The series have been reinvigorated, rejuvenated and in one single stroke have secured that this franchise will live forever.
A note to Barbara Broccoli, the producer, your father would be so proud. This is among the best bond movies! You have to see it.
After all the controversy and comments on Daniel Craig's potential as an actor and doubts over him playing Bond He's here to stay. He has that natural feeling about him when you see him on the screen as Bond, that attitude, style, confidence matched only by Sean COnnery.
The movie as a whole is extremely entertaining and exciting. The acting is awesome Eva Green actually does a great job and has really improved her acting from the last time i saw her in kingdom of heaven , but then this is a totally different movie.
There's a lot of action mixed with great story which i am sure will please the true Bond fan. Please go and watch this because you will regret if you don't, forget the past this is the New Bond.
In the original Bond series, only a handful of films really attempted to touch base with the novels of Ian Fleming.
No" showed the Fleming feeling for character and action, but introduced elements to the plot that detracted from the 'hard-boiled' spy story that Fleming thought he was writing; "Thunderball" came close, but that was because Fleming developed the story on commission for the film.
The decision to make a 21st Century version of Fleming's first Bond novel - and, beyond the update, to remain true to the novel, sans comic patter, sans sci-fi techno-schtick, sans major rewrite of the basic plot - promised to present Bond fans of all ages with a direct challenge.
Do we want the hard-boiled spy Fleming first envisioned - patterned after Chandler's Philip Marlowe and W. Somerset Maughm's Ashenden "or: Or would we really rather have the suave stand-up comedian and Playboy magazine contributor introduced by Broccoli, Maibaum, Young, and company, in the second Connery film, "From Russia With Love"?
Well, the votes are still being tallied on that. As someone who came to Bond reading "Goldfinger" at the tender age of twelve the phrase "round, firm, pointed breasts" has been an inspiration to me since , the closer the films came to the sense of the novels, the happier I was.
So of course, this version of Bond is a joyous surprise for me - my youthful daydreams have been vindicated and at last fully satisfied.
There are indeed elements added to the plot, but they are completely congruent with it. There is the use of current technology, but no techno-schtick - i.
There are the luscious Bond babes 2 - the minimum Bond requirement , but there is no attempt to reduce them to photogenic sex-toys.
The film's opening this novel out to the world is actually quite welcome, and does not affect the central plot or its theme.
The character of Bond presented in this film may disappoint followers of the original films, but the news is, this is FLEMING's Bond - an orphan uncertain of his own identity, a disillusioned romantic trying hard to pretend he's incapable of emotions, a middle class, middle-brow, middle-level management type who just happens to kill people for a living.
But he does it extremely well. The other problem some general viewers may have is the level of violence in the film; having determined to film the novel realistically, director Martin Campbell has decided to ditch the 'B-movie' violence of most of the earlier films, and present us the violence with a hard 'British neo-noir' edge to it.
Given the romantic plot twist toward the end, this would be a perfect date movie - except that the violence left some of the female viewers in the theater I attended clearly unsettled.
That's not necessarily a bad thing, it just is part of the gestalt of the film's experience. Cambell's direction is very good; the writing is crisp; production values are very high; the photography is stunning.
Some of the stunt work is truly remarkable, worthy competition for Jackie Chan. The acting is rock-solid and believable for these characters.
There is plenty of muscle for the action-film fan, and some real brains for the more general viewer to ponder later.
This film is best viewed with minimal reliance on knowledge of the previous series. In fact, it functions perfectly well as a 'one-off', a film without a series.
But of course, the ending invites a sequel. In Godzilla terms, Connery and Moore having given us the 'showa' Bond, Dalton and Brosnan the "Heisei" Bond, we now have the "Millenium" series James Bond - not a prequel nor even a 'reboot', but, really, an entirely new series about the same character.
It is probably too much to hope for, but maybe they can make the sequels just as good as this. As a genre film it never quite lifts above its genre; so normally I would only give it "nine stars" as a film.
However, as a film within its genre, it is top-of-the-line - so it gets a ten. Shanus 11 November There is only one movie franchise that has twisted, turned and reinvented itself on so many occasions The originally unpopular Craig grinds through this action packed feature with ease and in my opinion proves all of his doubters including me very very wrong..
At last we have another true Bond.. Sharp, sophisticated and as tough as nails And perhaps correctly more shaken than stirred. Well certain people thought Daniel Craig could not pull it off, but he has and with style and a cold steel edge, not seen since Sean Connery.
This is proper action hero stuff, but he actually looks like if he wanted to he could kill you. With an opening sequence that will stop you from blinking for 20 minutes.
The film is class, from the cinematography, to the three dimensional villains, and Bond's rapid learning curve. Like Dr No, you see a killer, just he is on our side.
Don't read reviews, just go and see it, and tell your friends what you thought, you won't be disappointed. I saw this at a special premiere and i was amazed.
After watching Brosnans invisible car in the previous incarnation I thought it could only get worse. How wrong was I! He exudes confidant menace.
They have gone back to basics with this Bond ie character and dialogue driven and not thankfully gadget driven. Not only is it the best bond film out so far its one of the years best films out.
They have borrowed some elements from the Bourne series of films which is long overdue on the franchise, more realistic fight sequences and with Daniel Craig actually looking like a physically capable man instead of the middle aged paunch of Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan who both quite frankly couldn't beat up a Ritz cracker.
Having just achieved his 00 status, James Bond is assigned to uncover a plot by tracking a bomber for hire. Removed from the mission by M, Bond nevertheless follows the only lead he has to Miami where he finds himself working round the edges of a plot by criminal Le Chiffre to invest his clients money in the stock market just before an engineered event should send shares in a direction favourable for him.
After the poor CGI and overblown if fun affair that was Die Another Day, the series was at risk of just throwing more and more money at the screen in an attempt to exaggerate and increase the Bond formula to keep fans happy.
And, in fairness it seems financially to be working for them but this is not to say that the drastically scaled back feel of Casino Royale is not a welcome change of direction for the series, because for me it most certainly was.
Opening with a gritty, short and violent pre-credit sequence, the film moves through a cool title sequence with a typically Bondian if only so-so theme song.
PG for intense sequences of violent action, a scene of torture, sexual content and nudity. Daniel Craig as James Bond. Eva Green as Vesper Lynd.
Mads Mikkelsen as Le Chiffre. Judi Dench as M. Jeffrey Wright as Felix Leiter. Giancarlo Giannini as Mathis. Caterina Murino as Solange.
Simon Abkarian as Alex Dimitrios. Jesper Christensen as Mr. Ivana Milicevic as Valenka. Claudio Santamaria as Carlos.
Tobias Menzies as Villiers. Sebastien Foucan as Mollaka. Malcolm Sinclair as Dryden. Richard Sammel as Gettler.
Ludger Pistor as Mendel. Joseph Millson as Carter. Daud Shah as Fisher. Clemans Schick as Kraft.
Emmanuel Avena as Leo. Tom Chadbon as Stockbroker. Dayo Ade as Infante. Urbano Barberini as Tomelli. Madame Wu as Tsai Chin.
Charlie Levi Leroy as Gallardo. Lazar Ristovski as Kaminofsky. Tom So as Fukutu. Veruschka von Lehndorff as Gräfin von Wallenstein.
Daniel Andreas as Dealer. Christina Cole as Ocean Club Receptionist. Jürgen Tarrach as Schultz. John Gold as Card Player. Jerry Inzerillo as Card Player.
Diane Hartford as Card Player. Jessica Renae Miller as Dealer. Paul Bhattacharjee as Hot Room Doctor. Simon Cox as Hot Room Technician.
Rebecca Gethings as Hot Room Technician. Peter Notley as M16 Technician. John Chancer as Police Commander. Pater Brooke as Airport Policeman.
Jason Durran as Airport Policeman. Robert Jezek as Arresting Officer. Michael Offei as Obanno's Leutenant. Makhoudia Diaw as Obanno's Liaison.
Wilson as Chief of Police. Vladimir Kulhavy as Croatian General. Valentine Nonyela as Nambutu Embassy Official.
Dusan Pelech as Bartender. Alessandra Ambrosio as Tennis Girl. Veronika Hladikova as Tennis Girl. Olutunji Ebun-Cole as Cola Kid.
Martin Ucik as Barman. Miroslav Simünek as Disapproving Man. Jaroslav Jankovsky as Hermitage Waiter. View All Casino Royale News. November 2, Full Review….
Bond as a human being? October 18, Full Review…. August 17, Rating: